Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rendell: 'The Media Does Not Like the Clintons'
Washington Post ^ | 2-25-08 | Chris Cillizza

Posted on 02/26/2008 11:26:01 AM PST by kingattax

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) said Monday that the media's pro-Obama (or anti-Clinton) bias explains in part why Barack Obama is portrayed as running away with the Democratic presidential nomination (instead of being locked in a close fight with Hillary Rodham Clinton).

"The media does not like the Clintons for whatever reason," Rendell, a Clinton supporter, said in an interview with The Fix. "Maybe some of it's [the Clintons'] fault, but the media does not like the Clintons."

Rendell insisted that the "media has relished this fall with glee that I have never seen in any other candidate in the thirty years I have been in the business." As a result, "Right now the senator can do no wrong," Rendell said of Obama.

His criticism of the coverage came on the same day that this photo appeared on the Drudge Report, accompanied by an e-mail purportedly written by a Clinton campaign staffer wondering aloud about a double standard in the way the two candidates were covered.

On a conference call later on Monday, a top Clinton campaign aide decried the alleged difference in the way the race is being covered. "I think it is true that every time the Obama campaign in this campaign has attacked Senator Clinton in the worst kind of personal ways, attacked her veracity, attacked her credibility, said that she would say or do anything to get elected, the press has largely applauded him," spokesman Howard Wolfson said, according to The Page's Mark Halperin. "When we have attempted to make contrasts with Senator Obama, we have been criticized for it."

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; mediabias; pa2008; rendell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last
those poor clintons, kicked around like dogs by the mean, mean media. i am appalled
1 posted on 02/26/2008 11:26:03 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Rendell: ‘The Media Does Not Like the Clintons’...Who does???


2 posted on 02/26/2008 11:27:12 AM PST by Holicheese (Beware your friendly air defenses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Figures that Rendell can’t figure out why anyone would dislike the Clintons. Fortunately he doesn’t have much company on that count.


3 posted on 02/26/2008 11:27:25 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

That’s funny. The media loves them when they’re running against Republicans.


4 posted on 02/26/2008 11:28:54 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

But.. But....
The Clinton’s Were HEROS!!!
They were worshipped as GODS, and even covered by the celebrity press on E!

HOW COULD THIS BE????

Oh....
They now have a NEW Messiah, that isn’t over 60 and geriatric, that appeals to a younger demographic.

That’s just gotta suck for a boomer to realize....


5 posted on 02/26/2008 11:28:56 AM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Did he say why?


6 posted on 02/26/2008 11:29:11 AM PST by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Some media bias. What other candidate can lose 11 consecutive primaries/caucuses and still be considered "in the hunt" by the media at large?

As for taking glee in the Clintons downward spiral, well the media had a grand old time chronicling the campaign implosion of Rudy Guiliani.

7 posted on 02/26/2008 11:29:28 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 63 days away from outliving Dan Quisenberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The Clintons tactics of strongarming the media and refusing them access unless they behave has finally backfired. The last episode when Chris Matthews was forced to apologize and then the pimping out Chelsea comment were subject to threats from the Clintons. The media types are sick of this. When the Clintons have no power, no one is afraid of them.


8 posted on 02/26/2008 11:30:40 AM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Nobody LIKES the Clintons. They are dispicable people, even to liberals. The media simply pandered to them because they delivered power. Same with McCain. It’s funny to watch them both discover the truth.


9 posted on 02/26/2008 11:33:01 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

The new Messiah also doesn’t have a voice like a chain saw trying to cut quartz.


10 posted on 02/26/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by WayneS (Don't Blame Me, I voted for Kodos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; All

Rendell: ‘The Media Does Not Like the Clintons’

This is hard to beleive, given Hillary is the muscle behind the Media Matters organzation, not to mention her involvement with Daily KOS. George Soros and all his $billions$ will not allow this to happen!!


11 posted on 02/26/2008 11:35:10 AM PST by wingsof liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
For once I agree with the media. I don't like the Clintons either.
12 posted on 02/26/2008 11:35:53 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

It only took the media 15+ years to figure out what most FReepers figured out in the ‘92 campaign.


13 posted on 02/26/2008 11:37:05 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Actually, I take this as kind of a lament on Fast Eddie’s part. Gov. Rendell, longtime FOB, pinned his hopes to the Clinton’s retake of the WH...(Eddie wants to move on from the podunk that is Harrisburg). Ed, no doubt, ‘promoised’ that PA would go for Hillary (heck, it probably still will...but it won’t matter). This is Ed’s way of whining w/o saying what he really wants to say.


14 posted on 02/26/2008 11:38:19 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Michelle Obama: this seasons Teresa Heinz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Rendell - one of the biggest Clintooooooooon knee pad wearers! I wonder if he uses cigars?


15 posted on 02/26/2008 11:38:24 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Rendell overlooks that the only asset Hillary has is that she is Mrs. Clinton. The media and about everyone else has had it with old names.


16 posted on 02/26/2008 11:38:31 AM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingsof liberty
This is hard to beleive, given Hillary is the muscle behind the Media Matters organzation, not to mention her involvement with Daily KOS. George Soros and all his $billions$ will not allow this to happen!!

Daily Kos dumped Hiliary before anyone else did, they hated her more then the freepers here did.

The rest of the left, has sold Hiliary down the river, she has been abandoned, they have moved on to the new flavor of the month, and its not a Clinton.

17 posted on 02/26/2008 11:39:16 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

PAYBACK is a B*tch, eh, Hillary? Can’t just call up the MSM and order them to do your bidding anymore, huh?


18 posted on 02/26/2008 11:40:32 AM PST by goodnesswins (Being Challenged Builds Character; Being Coddled Destroys Character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

For once I agree with the media.


19 posted on 02/26/2008 11:45:51 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

yeah, why should they be any different?


20 posted on 02/26/2008 11:50:32 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
...the media does not like the Clintons."

You have got to be kidding. I think Rendell traded his crystal ball in for a brick 'cause he sure ain't seeing the same things everyone else is.

21 posted on 02/26/2008 11:52:43 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
“Rendell: ‘The Media Does Not Like the Clintons’...Who does???”

Well, we have Fast Eddie, Joe Sestak, John Murtha, and the list goes on.

22 posted on 02/26/2008 11:54:10 AM PST by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
PAYBACK is a B*tch, eh, Hillary? Can’t just call up the MSM and order them to do your bidding anymore, huh?

The only way there could be an equitable payback for all that the she-devil and her cohort have done to this country and individuals, is if she were waiting on death row at Leavenworth, and the wait was expedited.
23 posted on 02/26/2008 12:07:02 PM PST by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

GWB was once quoted as saying (paraphrasing) that “the son inherits half his father’s friends & all of his enemies.” I suspect that it’s the same for Hillary. Half the Media view her with suspicion while the other half support her automatically on account of Bill. Whoever the last-standing non-Clinton candidate was, he/she was bound to benefit from a sort of free-ride.


24 posted on 02/26/2008 12:07:29 PM PST by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

Sad. Did you ever go to the Cherry Street Tavern? My wife used to live in Center City right at the edge of the Penn campus. We spent many evenings in the CST.


25 posted on 02/26/2008 12:09:23 PM PST by Holicheese (Beware your friendly air defenses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

As my sister, who is a huge Liberal and HRC fan says, I am enjoying this waaaaay too much!


26 posted on 02/26/2008 12:13:32 PM PST by gridlock (Proud McCain Supporter since February 7, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

BS. The lamestream media LOVES the Clintons. They just love Obama more. To the MSM, almost any rat is better than almost any Republican; some rats are better than others (the more leftist, the better), and some Republicans are better than others (the more leftist, the better). It isn’t a 0 or a 1, there is a continuum.


27 posted on 02/26/2008 12:15:54 PM PST by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If Rendell thinks the media has a bias against the clintons, he can’t imagine how contemptible I find the criminals.


28 posted on 02/26/2008 12:16:35 PM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“”Rendell: ‘The Media Does Not Like the Clintons””

Jeez, Ed, if you want to see what happens when the media doesn’t like you, try joining the Republican Party.


29 posted on 02/26/2008 12:16:43 PM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

30 posted on 02/26/2008 12:24:46 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
Fat, fast eddy wants to give a lewinsky to the klintoons, he just can't figure out which one gets to go first.

There's a mental picture that should make all but the strongest, go for the barf bag.

31 posted on 02/26/2008 12:24:54 PM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

hillary represents a clinton record of 8 years of economic growth with tosses to liberal causes on the side. Obama represents Carter. Total financial meltdown. Is that what the MSM wants?


32 posted on 02/26/2008 12:27:38 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

It's a RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY from Obama!

/Sarcasm OFF

33 posted on 02/26/2008 12:33:21 PM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Didn’t Chef Robert Irvine do an episode of Dinner Impossible for Fast Eddie? Felt sorry for him.

Mrs. JohnnyP and I had to go to Philly a few years ago. Very depressing place.


34 posted on 02/26/2008 12:34:33 PM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
"'The Media Does Not Like the Clintons'"

They probably always hated them - but they hated President Bush more!! What else could they do but fawn over & cover the Toons' a$$es!!

Now they can tell us how they really feel!!

35 posted on 02/26/2008 12:35:04 PM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Of course, the media likes Clinton. They just don’t think that she can beat the Republican candidate.


36 posted on 02/26/2008 12:37:32 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
"Is that what the MSM wants?"

Of course they want to go back to Carter. They just think Carter didn't have enough time and opportunity to destroy the entire economy. They want Obama to go back and finish the job so somebody like Reagan can never come along, pick up the pieces, and breath life back into the Republic.

37 posted on 02/26/2008 12:38:19 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Figures that Rendell can’t figure out why anyone would dislike the Clintons. Fortunately he doesn’t have much company on that count.

If it weren't for the smell, fast Eddie would have a tough time locating the seat of his pants.

38 posted on 02/26/2008 12:44:34 PM PST by dearolddad (Opinions are like rectums: everybody has one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

‘The Media Does Not Like the Clintons’

Since when?? Yesterday?? The media has been carrying their water since Bill stepped on stage in 1992!!


39 posted on 02/26/2008 12:44:50 PM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“Rendell insisted that the “media has relished this fall with glee that I have never seen in any other candidate in the thirty years I have been in the business.”

The Clintons are getting treated no worse than any Republican has ever been treated, except perhaps RINOS like McCain.

And he obviously doesn’t remember the venemous hatred the press had for Nixon and Reagan.


40 posted on 02/26/2008 12:45:26 PM PST by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

He does a lot of stuff in Philly. he did a tail gate at an Eagles game.
I always have a good time when I go but you have to be on yoru guard like in any big city.


41 posted on 02/26/2008 12:45:39 PM PST by Holicheese (Beware your friendly air defenses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Fast Eddie apparently doesn’t remember that the media elected Bill to 8 yrs in the White House, stood by him til the bitter end, sent hillary to the Senate, annointed her as shoo-in as President, and covered up 35 years of crimes and treason on their part. Then, the media found somebody they like better, just like the fickle lightweights they are.


42 posted on 02/26/2008 12:51:17 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
FTA: the media does not like the Clintons.

Could he point me in the direction of anyone who does like the Clintons?

Even the arguments of the feminists who support her breaks down not to "she's competent", but "she's a woman". When that's all you got, you got nothin'.

43 posted on 02/26/2008 12:51:21 PM PST by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“The media does not like the Clintons for whatever reason,”

Good. The media has treated President Bush like dirt for all these years; it’s about time the Clintons know what it feels like.


44 posted on 02/26/2008 12:57:10 PM PST by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The media loved the Clintons before it created Obambi. All that has happened is that the media has tossed aside the Clintons in favor of its own spawn.


45 posted on 02/26/2008 1:18:12 PM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Some members of the media, like a lot of democrats, see this current campaign as an opportunity to break free of the iron-fisted control of the Clintons. Up until now, even democrats buckled under to the will of the Clintons, fearful of what they might do to any transgressor. But, now, with Obama surging in the polls and in the primaries, former media stooges and former fearful democrats are making their break for freedom! It is not at all unlike some East Germans vaulting the wall during the last days of the Soviet Union.


46 posted on 02/26/2008 1:27:18 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
the media ...... covered up 35 years of crimes and treason on their part

The media finally cancelled the Clintons pass for 'free rides' .... what I REALLY want to see is someone cancel their 'get out of jail free' card.

47 posted on 02/26/2008 1:39:23 PM PST by MissMagnolia (There's no "Green" in Red, White & Blue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
To the MSM, almost any rat is better than almost any Republican; some rats are better than others (the more leftist, the better), and some Republicans are better than others (the more leftist, the better).

Well put. This explains why the media has been so hard on G. W. Bush: Even though he has tended to be one of the most liberal Republican presidents in a long time, he is just a bit TOOO conservative for the MSM, and therefore he is being punished with great severity. It probably stems from the fact that he said something positive about Jesus Christ, and something negative about abortion. To liberals, these two things amount to hate crimes.

48 posted on 02/26/2008 1:43:12 PM PST by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Well, Fast Eddie; I’m from Pennsylvania and I don’t like YOU.


49 posted on 02/26/2008 1:44:20 PM PST by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

It’s called karma. And it couldn’t happen to a nicer couple!


50 posted on 02/26/2008 1:44:30 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson