Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colleges balk at Rendell budget
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | 2/27/2008 | Tracie Mauriello

Posted on 02/27/2008 11:45:50 AM PST by Born Conservative

Includes 1.5% hike for Penn State, Pitt, Temple and Lincoln

HARRISBURG -- "Completely inadequate."

That's how Penn State University President Graham Spanier characterized Gov. Ed Rendell's proposed 1.5 percent funding increase for state-related universities.

"If the appropriation doesn't even come close to the increases in the rest of the budget, and doesn't even come close to the rate of inflation, it puts a burden on the tuition side of the equation," he said.

Dr. Spanier and the heads of the other state-related universities -- the University of Pittsburgh, Temple University and Lincoln University -- testified before the House Appropriations Committee yesterday.

There is only so much the general fund budget can bear, said Chuck Ardo, Mr. Rendell's spokesman.

"The reality is we have to live within the constraints of the revenue we get, and that requires us to make difficult decisions," he said. "Health care continues to eat up more of the budget, and in corrections we are incarcerating more people. These are places where we have no options about whether to spend money."

Higher education is an area where there is more discretion, Mr. Ardo said.

Mr. Rendell proposed increasing funding to the state-related universities by 1.5 percent as part of his $27.3 billion budget proposal.

University leaders say it would take at least a 4.1 percent increase to keep up with general inflation, and even more to match increases in higher education costs, which rise at a greater rate than the general cost of living.

(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: fasteddie; pennstate

1 posted on 02/27/2008 11:45:53 AM PST by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
and even more to match increases in higher education costs, which rise at a greater rate than the general cost of living.

Maybe if the government gravy train stopped chugging...this wouldn't happen.

This is in no way a defense of Fast Eddie.

2 posted on 02/27/2008 11:48:06 AM PST by RockinRight (Supreme Court Justice Fred Thompson. The next best place for Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Maybe it puts pressure on the endowment or on faculty and administration salaries?
3 posted on 02/27/2008 11:51:40 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

A Republican governor would always look for ways to keep from rocking the boat when it came to funding education & state employee salary contracts. I warned my Dem friends about electing a Democrat, but did they listen? Nooooooo! You can’t even make a self-interest argument with the other side.


4 posted on 02/27/2008 11:52:25 AM PST by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I hate to say it, but I agree with Rendell’s administration stance that they need to hold the line on spending. Mine, as well, is in no way a defense of Fast Eddie, but he’s right.

Getting rid of tenure and holding college profs accountable for the quality of their work would be a good start....


5 posted on 02/27/2008 11:55:45 AM PST by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

How about taking what the taxpayers give you and try managing your budgets. The State should prohibit these Ivory Tower a-holes from raising tuition. Gee, maybe they would have to get rid of some touchy feely electives and the Mid East Studies Department.


6 posted on 02/27/2008 11:58:14 AM PST by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
....it puts a burden on the tuition side of the equation," he said.

MEANING, THEY'LL GET THEIR MONEY ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.........

7 posted on 02/27/2008 12:06:27 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Here is a novel approach, cut spending.


8 posted on 02/27/2008 12:08:27 PM PST by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Have our institutions of higher education ever learned how to cut expenses. Cutting out some of the small enrollment majors, unnecessary classes, decimate the mid-managers in the administration of the school, cutting out a percentage of lights, stop heating unused space, holding salaries to reasonable levels, etc. Maybe something we used to supply economy.Try making every department justify it's existence.

State auditors need to take control of these schools and teach them a course in everyday economics.

9 posted on 02/27/2008 12:16:05 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Hey Spanier, take a look at the endowment. Stop begging. Jettison half of your majors (your own website lists over 160 - come on, that’s fluff) and stop handing out money to illiterate, uneducatable goons in the name of diversity or athletics.


10 posted on 02/27/2008 12:37:27 PM PST by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Interesting that PA can afford to give U. of Penn $50 million when it costs students $45K per year to attend, but they can’t manage more than 1.5% for Penn State and the other state universities. I was just watching the appropriations committe hearings on PCN.


11 posted on 02/27/2008 2:39:56 PM PST by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Maybe you hadn’t heard about Rendell’s *stimulus* plan to give away $ to low income folks.


12 posted on 02/27/2008 2:41:22 PM PST by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finnsheep

I was specifically addressing this issue; I’m definitely aware of his other income distribution schemes....


13 posted on 02/28/2008 2:29:44 AM PST by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

In the past 2 years, Pitt added “domestic partner” benefits to its perks in defiance of the state.


14 posted on 02/28/2008 8:29:34 PM PST by Hacksaw (I support the tiger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson