Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Let public in on government labor deals
Sacramento Bee ^ | 5/13/8 | Editor

Posted on 05/13/2008 12:47:15 PM PDT by SmithL

Peter Scheer, who heads the California First Amendment Coalition, has a novel idea: End the secrecy surrounding local government labor contract negotiations.

You can understand the logic and the urgency behind his idea when you consider the situation in Vallejo. That city is filing for bankruptcy. Why? Local officials approved salary and benefits costs for current employees and retirees that are more than the city can afford.

Scheer's point is that California law allows local government officials "to avoid public discussion of the true cost and fiscal impact of the pay deals that they have approved." By the time the public sees anything, a union contract already is a done deal and no changes can be made.

In some states, all phases of the bargaining process, including negotiations, are open to the public (though government officials may discuss strategy for labor negotiations in closed session). Minnesota, Florida, Kansas and Tennessee are examples.

California is at the opposite extreme. The state's Brown Act not only allows negotiations about salaries and benefits to be conducted behind closed doors, it allows local government officials to vote on a final agreement in closed session. Only after that vote and union acceptance of the contract does the local government have to let the public in on the deal. And only then does the text of the contract become a public record – when it's too late to change anything.

The situation in Vallejo should cause legislators to revisit this nonsense.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: labor; unionthugs; yourtaxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 05/13/2008 12:47:16 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why should the public be told how their money is being spent?

They should all just shut up and be governed.


2 posted on 05/13/2008 12:55:11 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Scheer's point is that California law allows local government officials "to avoid public discussion of the true cost and fiscal impact of the pay deals that they have approved." By the time the public sees anything, a union contract already is a done deal and no changes can be made.

There's a big part of the problem right there.
3 posted on 05/13/2008 12:56:29 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson