Posted on 05/16/2008 2:35:44 PM PDT by kellynla
Today in Watertown, South Dakota, Barack Obama responded to comments about appeasement made by President Bush in the Israeli Knesset yesterday. He linked John McCain to Bush, saying that McCain "embraced" the comments in a conference call with bloggers.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
McCain SHOULD embrace the comments, only a foul left wing immoral jackass would not embrace the president’s statement.
If Obama doesn’t embrace those sentiments he is a radical and an idiot and should never be president. Period.
Bari Hussein is taking himself way too seriously. The WH is already indicating that the President was referring to Jimmah Cahtah and not some idiot Senator from Illinois.
Sure has a lot of “whiteys” up there behind him. His staff is on the ball...
“When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that barks loudest is the one that got hit.”
Funny, my Dad said the exact same thing!
We’re not related are we? LOL
“Sure has a lot of whiteys up there behind him. His staff is on the ball...”
I wonder what the union rate is for screen extras. LOL
Obama says he can win a debate with Bush and McCain on protecting America. ????
Both Mcain and Bush have actually worked at and protected America. McCain in the military and Bush as President when he responed to the Islamofacist declaration of war on America on 9/11.
What has Obama done top protect America? More to the point what has Obama ever done at all for America?
Sorry Obama. I have no real like for either McCain or Bush but both are far better men then you could ever dream of being..............
Liberal Democrats have been sympathizing with, sometimes colluding with, our enemies for years. That’s nothing but the truth, as you can see by their reaction every time someone has the guts to call them on it.
“Lefties=narcissistic boobs” LOL
Watertown is 99.5% typical white people. The rest are Mexicans.
“What! Frightened with false fire?” (Act III, Scene II) I believe Shakespeare had Obama’s number even back then.
What's that old saying about it being better to be called a fool and to remain silent, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt?



“Obama always sounds angry?”
That’s what 20 years of anti-American racist indoctrination does to ya.
“Obama says he can win a debate with Bush and McCain on protecting America. ????”
Obama couldn’t win a debate with my Jeep Cherokee. LMAO
The more I see and hear Obama, the more I despise him. He is perhaps the most arrogant politician I have seen in my life - and that includes the insufferable charlatan John Kerry, who previously held that position. The combination of Obama and his anti-white harridan wife is more than I can stomach. Barack Hussein Obama would be a disaster as President of the USA.
Now we know why Obama was so fast to get “insulted” by a comment that had nothing to do with him.
It’s so he can get more free airtime to make another messianic speech.
...”Bush as President when he responed to the Islamofacist declaration of war on America on 9/11”...
Actually, they declared war on America November 4, 1979, in Tehran, Iran. A democrat party President sat on his hands -with the exception of Eagle Claw - and let the islamics hold US citizens hostage for 444 days. Another feckless democrat (is there any other kind?), Bill Clilnton, let Osama bin Laden get away at least twice when CIA SAS operatives had him in their sights in Afghanistan. We can lay 9/11 at the feet of Clinton, and if Obama is elected we can expect new open season on Americans globally.
We'll find out with the next FEC filing.;^)
That said, do keep an eye on the crowds in his screenshots. I'll bet they are filled with typical, clinging, crackers. 'Fauxbama' is all they got now (with an evergrowing buyer's remorse) and if you thought they hid the true Clinton from the sheeple in the '92 election, you ain't seen nothin' yet. BTW, many thanks for all of your posts and have a good weekend...
Maybe but see #24 as to future staging, IMHO...
Until we have a better field of true blue conservative governors to choose from for POTUS; I will continue to do as I have done since Reagan and “hold my nose” and vote “R”.
What we need is for true blue conservatives to “step up to the plate” and run for local, state and federal elected offices across America if we are ever going to clean up this mess. And we reeeeeeeeeeely need a better field of conservative governors to choose from to run for POTUS.
“BTW, many thanks for all of your posts”
Don’t mention it, “Old Timer” LOL
“have a good weekend”
Same to ya...Lakers, Dodgers & Angels! Gonna be a good one!
I saw this on tv and do you notice all the “typical white folks” in the stands behind him? Later in a rope line it was more of the same..no black folks..
I supposed this it to bulk up his supposed support by “typical white folks”.
Great saying..got to remember that one!
Maybe
Is Hussein insane?
Hussein said “ Yes I would” to unconditional face to face meetings with terrorist states:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1dSPrb5w_k
“...would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition.. with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea...? “
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, “ YES I WOULD...”
Hussein Obama would do well to read up on the man he is stying himself after. Quisling
Hussein Obama said: "You're attacking me!"
Doh!
Hussein said Yes I would?
Hey, we’re dealing with an amateur politician who’s still wet behind the ears...
he was a state legislator before he was elected to the U.S. Senate...and he hasn’t been in the Senate long enough to know where the restrooms are. LOL
No need. The MSM is covering for him just fine.
I just watched a serious panel on Hardball discuss what "appeasement" means. People like Andrea Mitchell, Mike Allen, etc. (I'm not saying I agree w/ them. But they set the tone, like it or not.)
According to them, Bush and McCain are wrong because Neville Chamberlain's "appeasement" was: "He thought Hitler would be satisfied with being 'given' a few small countries".
That's not my definition. To me, appeasement is the willingness to take an enemy's peace offers seriously out of the naive belief that he wants peace. (In reality the appeaser wants "peace" too much)
Chris' question was "What did Chamberlain do?". His supposed answer is that he traded some small countries to Hitler. That wasn't the worst of it and Chris should know...he's just blinded to the historical parallels. Chamberlain's faux peace deal led France, Britain and other countries to let down their guard and fail to prepare adequately for war (preparations that would have given Hitler pause---i.e. peace through strength).
To me, it's that simple. Peace deals are fine...as long as the guy on the other side of the table believes you're strong enough to punish him if he breaks the deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.