Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Let Fannie and Freddie Wither?
Business Week ^ | 11 July 2008 | Peter Coy

Posted on 07/12/2008 4:58:27 PM PDT by BGHater

In good times, they were superfluous. Now they're only as good as their U.S. guarantee

Are Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) really too big to fail? That's certainly a widely held assumption across much of the political spectrum. Republican Presidential candidate John McCain voiced the conventional wisdom on July 10 when he said, "They must not fail." Democrat Charles Schumer, the New York senator, agreed, saying: "Markets should be assured that the federal government will stand by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

On July 11, shares in the two companies briefly dropped about 50%, but recovered late in the session. Investors are concerned that if house prices continue to fall and foreclosures rise, losses on Fannie and Freddie's portfolios of mortgage-backed securities will force them to turn to the government for help. The condition for a government rescue, if one were needed, might force shareholders to lose their entire investments.

But while it's clear that Fannie and Freddie can't be allowed to go under abruptly, a good case could be made that the two mortgage financing giants headquartered in Washington's Beltway are part of the problem in housing (BusinessWeek, 6/26/08) rather than part of the solution. If that's so, then this might be an opportune moment to let them begin slowly to wither away.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; bailout; fannie; fanniemae; freddie; freddiemac; government; govwatch; housingbubble; realestate; schumer

1 posted on 07/12/2008 4:58:28 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

IMHO, they were unconstitutional to begin with.


2 posted on 07/12/2008 5:00:41 PM PDT by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Perhaps some of what we are seeing is an orchestrated attempt to show just how bad things are?
Enron got bailed out by Bubba Clinton once or twice during his watch, and then they said to the new administration, “Hey, can ya bail us out again?” and were dismayed to find the answer was “No”.
The mortgage ‘crisis’ had no reason to exist, there was no reason for the banks to be doing what they did to create the situation.
And yet it exists.
Perhaps it exists solely to be a lesson?
I dunno, I’m not an economist.
But it does look like some of the info coming out is somewhat, “Hey, people, look at what your lenders are doing.”


3 posted on 07/12/2008 5:03:51 PM PDT by Darksheare (Why do they call it Salad Dressing when clothes aren't in any way involved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Nice to see that there is finally some questions being asked. First, do whats necessary to get us through the next couple of years, and I am willing to concede federal involvement in that. Long term solutions to this credit crisi, however, should include the federal government getting out of the mortgage and mortgage insurance business.


4 posted on 07/12/2008 5:06:58 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

F&F: they make money

1) retained portfolio,
2) guaranty fee,
3) ABS investments (partly a result of Barney Frank forcing them to buy subprime since F&F didn’t want to buy the loans)

Their losses are on (3). They could lose money on their retained portfolio is housing prices drop another 10-20%. But right now, they are not in trouble.

Typical media hysteria and various Wall Street firms trashing their competitors.


5 posted on 07/12/2008 5:10:16 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

F&F: they make money

1) retained portfolio,
2) guaranty fee,
3) ABS investments (partly a result of Barney Frank forcing them to buy subprime since F&F didn’t want to buy the loans)

Their losses are on (3). They could lose money on their retained portfolio is housing prices drop another 10-20%. But right now, they are not in trouble.

Typical media hysteria and various Wall Street firms trashing their competitors.


6 posted on 07/12/2008 5:10:16 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
Um, excuse me ... it's time people too RESPONSIBILTY for their foolish actions. The government needs to stay out of it.

You have a good heart ...

...”I am willing to concede federal involvement in that. Long term solutions to this credit crisis,...”

However this where we ALWAYS GO WRONG and GROW GOVERNMENT.

It's normal to feel bad but it's worse to have a totally socialized nation.

7 posted on 07/12/2008 5:16:25 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
“... I am willing to concede federal involvement in that. Long term solutions to this credit crisi, however, should include the federal government getting out of the mortgage and mortgage insurance business.”

LOOK at what you wrote (above).

You don't want government IN the mortgage business, probably not the health care business and I presume the insurance business ... YET, you “conde” to government for the mortgage “crisis”. Once the government gets involved, it NEVER LETS GO and only EXPANDS to more.

8 posted on 07/12/2008 5:19:21 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nmh

No, as I have stated, I don’t want the government in the mortgage business. I simply don’t want any action now that will make things worse.


9 posted on 07/12/2008 5:25:40 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

In other words let the free market system actually work instead of governmental interference? Heaven forbid!


10 posted on 07/12/2008 5:35:04 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

IMHO incompetence, affirmative action managers ,mismanagement all had a hand in the financial demise of these behemoths.


11 posted on 07/12/2008 5:40:55 PM PDT by gitmogrunt ( waiting for the backlash........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

The problem is. Is that Fannie Mae is a government subsidized entity that between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac there is 13 trillion dollars in subsidized housing! That’s Trillion not Billion.


12 posted on 07/12/2008 6:36:51 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Eliminate the damn mortgage deduction already.


13 posted on 07/13/2008 12:06:08 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
Long term solutions to this credit crisi, however, should include the federal government getting out of the mortgage and mortgage insurance business.

Call me a pessimist but I predict the opposite solution will be tried.

14 posted on 07/13/2008 6:01:58 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson