Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turnout Low on First Day of Handgun Registration
Washington Post ^ | July 17, 2008 | Paul Duggan

Posted on 07/17/2008 10:02:43 AM PDT by An Old Man

"It appears that the city does not yet understand the decision and order of the Supreme Court," said Heller, a 66-year-old a security guard.

"An applicant must fill out registration forms, submit fingerprints and pass a written firearm-proficiency test, while police ballistics experts test-fire the revolver. The revolver will then be returned to the owner, but he or she cannot legally use the weapon, even for self-defense, until notified that the registration has been approved. "

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; fenty; guncontrol; gunregistration; heller; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Let's hope that nobody needs their gun untill is is legal to use it!

Someone should throw all of these cretans in the brig.

Semper Fi
An Old Man

1 posted on 07/17/2008 10:02:43 AM PDT by An Old Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Sad.

We supposedly celebrate and pat ourselves on the back that we’ve sustained one of the God given liberties of our forefathers.

But what is the immediate result in actuality?

Gun Registration.

Sad.


2 posted on 07/17/2008 10:04:36 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Everything has a catch.


3 posted on 07/17/2008 10:07:22 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
...while police ballistics experts test-fire the revolver.

*snort*

4 posted on 07/17/2008 10:08:14 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Americans used to be a scrappy lot and would fight at the drop of a hat. Any government violation of the Constitution should be opposed today by massive civil disobedience or else the government will do as it pleases and the Constitution won’t be worth a bucket of cold _ _ _ _.


5 posted on 07/17/2008 10:08:55 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (When hopelessness replaces hope, it opens the door to evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

it will take years to approve these applications. and then the paperwork will get lost. oops!


6 posted on 07/17/2008 10:09:38 AM PDT by thefactor (the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Turnout is low probably because they’ve still made it over-burdensome to comply with the city’s revised laws, and that those laws are still extremely over-restrictive as to what types of weapons are allowed.

I hope the jerks are held personally liable for conspiracy to violate civil rights.


7 posted on 07/17/2008 10:11:52 AM PDT by kevkrom ("This is not the [fill in the blank] that I knew" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

you would think if you got your gun back you would have the registration back with it. If mean come on, if the police are going to keep the until ballistics testing is done, they should keep it until the registration is approved. What happens if you get your gun and the registration is denied? These guys are the biggest idiots on the planet.


8 posted on 07/17/2008 10:12:26 AM PDT by ClayinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Was this waht the SCOTUS really meant?


9 posted on 07/17/2008 10:12:58 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (OBAMA aka Post Turtle the Forest Gump of American Politics ABORTION -Liberal Child Abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Who wants to put an over/under bet on how long it’ll take for some DC resident finally uses their gun for lawful self defense, and then the DC gestapo tries to pile manslaughter or murder charges on for daring to defend onesself?

I’ll say within 9 months, it’ll happen.


10 posted on 07/17/2008 10:14:20 AM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Also why would anyone register now when the likelihood is that this requirement will get shot down too.

Why give them information that they don’t need to have.


11 posted on 07/17/2008 10:15:03 AM PDT by Harvey105
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: facedown
"while police ballistics experts test-fire the revolver."

I'm only guessing here, but is this done in order to get a 'ballistic fingerprint' on record?

12 posted on 07/17/2008 10:18:55 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
Turn out should have been nonexistent.
13 posted on 07/17/2008 10:19:12 AM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

My thoughts, too. And, since the firing of the gun is illegal until the registration is “approved,” I’m also guessing that the “ballistics experts” may be under a mandate to monkey with the gun to make it inoperable. And, since it will likely be decades until “approval” is given, the owner has no way of legally firing the gun to find out what damage the police “experts” did.


14 posted on 07/17/2008 10:22:36 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Harvey105
Also why would anyone register now when the likelihood is that this requirement will get shot down too. Why give them information that they don’t need to have.

Well, someone's got to bite the bullet (pun intended) to be the test case for getting the law overturned (Heller continues to be "DA MAN" here). But you're quite right, and hopefully Heller's legal team will argue that the low turnout is an indication that the restrictions are considered unreasonable by the residents of DC.

15 posted on 07/17/2008 10:23:40 AM PDT by kevkrom ("This is not the [fill in the blank] that I knew" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I think part of the problem is that you have to physically bring the firearm for registration, don’t you?

Since you can’t buy one in DC (no civilian stores), and you can’t buy one in MD and VA (not resident), it may be hard to walk in and claim the fifth.

How the heck do you do it?


16 posted on 07/17/2008 10:26:03 AM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

I’m guessing that good business could be had by gun techs in (I know there’s a term for this but it escapes me at the moment) re-doing (rifling?) the barrels after these “ballistic experts” do their “test firing,” and to check for a fix any monkeying they do.


17 posted on 07/17/2008 10:29:13 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman
"Turn out should have been nonexistent."

It is my belief that this whole business of registration is an unconstitutional infringement on my rights. Yesterday, I posted a link to a very interesting article written by Clayton Cramer on the subject of registration. If you have not already read the article, please do so now. I suspect you will find it quite interesting.

Semper Fi
An Old Man

18 posted on 07/17/2008 10:29:28 AM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
Americans used to be a scrappy lot and would fight at the drop of a hat. Any government violation of the Constitution should be opposed today by massive civil disobedience or else the government will do as it pleases and the Constitution won’t be worth a bucket of cold _ _ _ _.

Bingo. We have turned into a nation of sheep. We go along to get along, allow ourselves to be herded and grazed by a miniscule minority of people who deem themselves worthy to set the rules for us little people. Until significant numbers of people stand up and say, "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH," it will never change.

MM (in TX)

19 posted on 07/17/2008 10:31:07 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Ummmm...so are the violent criminals of DC suffering under the same restrictions? Do they have to submit a ‘mother may I’ to the District, have their AUTOLOADER test fired by the police, wait to use it until given the OK??? Eh? Inquiring minds want to know! Certainly theyre all lined up waiting to be serviced by the Districts Finest...right?


20 posted on 07/17/2008 10:31:26 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClayinVA

Guess I would keep my gun and not bother to register.:)


21 posted on 07/17/2008 10:32:19 AM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I sure as heck wouldn’t turn my gun over to these crooks for ballistic testing or anything else.


22 posted on 07/17/2008 10:37:24 AM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Since DC’s revised “gun registration” laws are essentially the same as the pre-Heller restrictions, the low turnout should not be a surprise to anyone.


23 posted on 07/17/2008 10:37:43 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 556x45
"Ummmm...so are the violent criminals of DC suffering under the same restrictions?"

Felons are by law exempt from the registration process!

Consider a law that requires registration of firearms: a convicted felon can not be convicted for failing to register a gun, because it is illegal under Federal law for a felon to possess a firearm; but a person who can legally own a gun, and fails to register it, can be punished. In short, the person at whom, one presumes, such a registration law is aimed, is the one who cannot be punished, and yet, the person at whom such a registration law is not principally aimed (i.e., the law-abiding person), can be punished.

Unintended consequences strike again!

Semper Fi
An Old Man

24 posted on 07/17/2008 10:38:14 AM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
Gun owners should insist that they keep the gun in their possession and accompany the ballistics officer for the test firing. The reason gun owners give is “to demonstrate that I keep track of and control my gun at all times.” I think it would be hard for gun grabbers to deny this logic, even though they would hate it.

We all know that as soon as you set down your pistol, it will get up and shoot someone; just like crack left on a table will fly inadvertently into the mayor's nose.

25 posted on 07/17/2008 10:38:53 AM PDT by Skenderbej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
"Guess I would keep my gun and not bother to register.:) "

You have the right idea! See my posts #18 and #24

Semper Fi
An Old Man

26 posted on 07/17/2008 10:41:53 AM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
Problem:

"while police ballistics experts test-fire the revolver."

I'm only guessing here, but is this done in order to get a 'ballistic fingerprint' on record?

You're correct. One possible solution: Buy a Dan Wesson revolver. For some stupid reason, any bottom loading pistol is classified as a 'machine gun' in DC. Have them test fire a barrel, then change it and toss the tested one in the Potomac.


27 posted on 07/17/2008 10:50:24 AM PDT by edpc (Tagline Currently Under Construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I would keep my gun to myself and take my chances at a failure to register charge should I have to use it in self defense.

Besides, I would argue that 99% of all gun crimes are committed with non-registered or stolen weapons.


28 posted on 07/17/2008 10:51:56 AM PDT by MikeWUSAF (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

DC isn’t very big, couldn’t someone just drive to VA and go to a range?


29 posted on 07/17/2008 10:54:26 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

This sounds like our concealed handgun permit check, except we test fire our own weapons.


30 posted on 07/17/2008 11:00:10 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Does ‘bottom loading’ include pistols with magazines in the grip?


31 posted on 07/17/2008 11:02:14 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
I'm only guessing here, but is this done in order to get a 'ballistic fingerprint' on record?

That, and:

"Ballistics examiners will compare the test-fired bullets to bullets from unsolved shootings to determine if a revolver was used in a crime."

32 posted on 07/17/2008 11:02:34 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Yes indeed......silly, isn’t it. On the other hand, it means (according to DC) I own machine guns.


33 posted on 07/17/2008 11:06:26 AM PDT by edpc (Tagline Currently Under Construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: facedown
That, and: "Ballistics examiners will compare the test-fired bullets to bullets from unsolved shootings to determine if a revolver was used in a crime."

How dumb is that? If you were gang-banging with a gun, why would you register it, and worse, if a crime had been committed, why would you bring it in so it could be ballistically fingerprinted? I don't think you could find a criminal stupid enough to do that.

34 posted on 07/17/2008 11:08:46 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
DC isn’t very big, couldn’t someone just drive to VA and go to a range?

That's kind of beside the point. You can't defend yourself, or your home without legal consequences, if you live in DC without going through all these machinations.

35 posted on 07/17/2008 11:09:14 AM PDT by edpc (Tagline Currently Under Construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I don't think you could find a criminal stupid enough to do that.

Never misunderestimate the stupidity of the average gangbanger. But it does strain credulity.

36 posted on 07/17/2008 11:12:34 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: edpc

True, but it was an answer to the guy who said the owner has no way of legally firing the gun to find out what damage the police “experts” did.


37 posted on 07/17/2008 11:18:29 AM PDT by stuartcr (Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
I sure wouldn't want my name on a list in some police station for exercising a natural right of self defense.
38 posted on 07/17/2008 11:21:21 AM PDT by fella ("...He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

You can tell the DC City Council is going to act like a bunch of petulent children about this. I can see in the end after they’ve lost all the court cases, they’ll probably throw up their hands and permit open/concealed carry of anything while they go sit in the corner.

Not that it would be a bad thing...


39 posted on 07/17/2008 11:26:38 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

My hubby and I have been locked and loaded for many years and we intend to keep it that way! We are “old” too! :)


40 posted on 07/17/2008 12:18:25 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
"My hubby and I have been locked and loaded for many years and we intend to keep it that way!"

Good for both of you!

Semper Fi
An Old Man

41 posted on 07/17/2008 12:24:47 PM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

That’s exactly what they’re referring to.

The idea is anything that does not have an inherent limit on capacity (like a revolver or fixed-mag semi) is a MG. The reasoning is that while some are intended for low capacity (M1911’s 7-8 round mags), extended mags exist or are possible (50 round drum mags are available for the M1911).


42 posted on 07/17/2008 12:52:42 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Your never been fired, never out of the box Colt Python will look like it went through the Katrina hurricane.


43 posted on 07/17/2008 3:45:37 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

What is lunitic about DC and their intentional insanity... As you are transporting your gun to where you register it and so on, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW.

Before you license it, buy it, take it home, transport it to a licensing location, take it our of your vehicle and carry it inside... throughout this entire part of the process, before you license it, you are in violation of their A$$WIPE law.

Just more of an example of the insanity, dishonesty, and total corruption comming from the left


44 posted on 07/17/2008 4:41:40 PM PDT by PRO 1 (POX on posters who's political bent causes them to refuse to be confused by the FACTS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Yes, I suppose so. In fact, I would be surprised if there were even any public access ranges in DC, given the gun laws there. Which would mean that DC residents would have to go to Virginia anyway, regardless of why they want to use the guns.

But accepting that option is tacitly approving of the new “registration” laws in DC, which are really just the old gun confiscation and control laws dressed up in different policy clothes. It’ll take someone to violate the new laws and get back to the Supreme Court to stomp DC again. The game never ends.


45 posted on 07/18/2008 10:46:45 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson