Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(TX Congressman John) Culberson weighing legislation for NASA overhaul
Houston Chronicle ^ | July 17, 2008 | STEWART M. POWELL

Posted on 07/17/2008 11:35:14 PM PDT by anymouse

Two days after telling an online town hall meeting that NASA had "failed us miserably" and "wastes a vast amount of money," Houston Rep. John Culberson said Thursday he was weighing legislation to overhaul the structure of the space agency responsible for about 20,000 Houston-area jobs.

(snip)

"We need revolutionary change, a complete restructuring," Culberson told the Houston Chronicle. "NASA needs complete freedom to hire and fire based on performance, it needs to be driven by the scientists and the engineers, and it needs to be free of politics as much as possible."

The fourth-term lawmaker said he was "kicking around" a proposal designed to make NASA more like the National Science Foundation, an independent federal agency led by a director and a 24-member board appointed by the president.

Culberson, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, said that despite spending $156.5 billion over the past decade, NASA had surrendered "a 40-year advantage" in space exploration. He said the agency continues to rely on liquid-fueled rockets with technology dating back to "Robert Goddard-era rockets" in the 1920s.

"I have always been a zealous advocate for the space program," said Culberson, who dates his interest in the subject to a childhood telescope. "But the setbacks are inexcusable and maddening — all because the magnificent men and women scientists and engineers have been frustrated by the bureaucracy, waste and duplication at headquarters."

(snip)

"There's a lot of wonderful people working there," said Culberson, "but NASA wastes a vast amount of money."

(snip)

"It was never my intention to demean the fine people of NASA who are working their hearts out to do their best with the constraints of a crippling bureaucracy that wastes money inexcusably," Culberson said.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Technical; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; nasa; reform; space
Lampson wants a bloated ineffective NASA, not one that empowers industry to build our economy instead of drain it.
1 posted on 07/17/2008 11:35:14 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

space reform ping


2 posted on 07/17/2008 11:35:37 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

This guy should work to get billions siphoned from the education budget and put it into NASA.

The space budget is minuscule compared to everything else.


3 posted on 07/17/2008 11:40:39 PM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

So you want someone else’s ox gored instead of your favorite pork?

Government waste is waste period and should all be reduced as much as we can. I am certain that Congressman Culberson is working to reduce waste in other areas of government including the Dept. of Education.

If NASA was as effective as they claim to be, we would have regularly scheduled flights into space and have off-Earth resources and products being shipped back to Earth with a net plus in tax payments derived from that activity verses the amount of tax money spent on it.

If you can’t imagine this as a plausible scenario, then why are you defending NASA? NASA has had 40 years to regularize spaceflight as a private sector industry. But as long as people like you demand it remain on the plantation of government bureaucracy and waste, we are just flushing tax dollars down the drain like the worst other agency like DoEd.


4 posted on 07/18/2008 12:17:49 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1riot1ranger; Action-America; Aggie Mama; Alkhin; Allegra; American72; antivenom; Antoninus II; ...

Houston PING


5 posted on 07/18/2008 12:56:48 AM PDT by weegee (Obama loves America like Bill loves Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Well said,
NASA is a bloated ineffective beauracracy. While it was in its early years very inventive, it has become less so as it became more fearful.


6 posted on 07/18/2008 3:13:59 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I’d be happy if they just fired James Hansen.


7 posted on 07/18/2008 4:03:36 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo (Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

They should start with Hansen’s GISS. This one agency has cost the world more wasted effort and cash through its global warming hoax than any other government agency in history.


8 posted on 07/18/2008 4:39:17 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
"NASA needs complete freedom to hire and fire based on performance, it needs to be driven by the scientists and the engineers, and it needs to be free of politics as much as possible."

If only....

9 posted on 07/18/2008 5:38:08 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears; anymouse

Don’t be so critical of Culbertson. These GOPers have to find something to run on besides queers and mexicans.


10 posted on 07/18/2008 6:34:23 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I've always believed that NASA in its current bureaucratic form should be abolished, and its assets and mission turned over to the U.S. Navy, so that it can build this:


11 posted on 07/18/2008 7:09:16 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I don’t know much about the private space industry, but the first mass amounts of people probably heard of it was a couple of years ago. Kinda hard to explore that when the only group “allowed” to do space stuff is a government agency. Putting people on the moon, sending probes out to other planets isn’t really an easy thing to do. If it burns up, it’s a few hundred million dollar satellite/probe, or worse, a crew of people. I would assume safety is paramount.

I do agree that wasteful spending should be eliminated, along with every other bloated agency, including the Dept. of Education.

I wouldn’t know how the FAA would change, but making it more efficient, while making them the first in line responsible for private space companies sounds like a start. The FAA could have a section that deals exclusively with NASA, probably just a handful of people.


12 posted on 07/18/2008 9:34:53 AM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Two terms, materials science and space elevators. Use the rockets and work on the next step in space access. Just my opinion.


13 posted on 07/18/2008 10:08:44 AM PDT by smaug6 (We can't afford to be innocent!! Stand up and face the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

The FAA already has a commercial space division which regulates the emerging private spaceflight industry. You can look it up on their website if you like.


14 posted on 07/18/2008 10:58:48 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson